Clyde (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) has just moved house after getting a divorce from his wife (Kyra Sedgwick). But it's not the house that's haunted in Ole Bornedal's english-language horror movie The Possession - it's an antique wooden box his tween daughter Emily (Natasha Calis) buys at a garage sale, one that we saw kill an old lady in a very silly-looking prologue. Emily even gets to see the wounded old lady freak out through a window while she's carrying the box away, while Anton Sanko's (otherwise decent) soundtrack imitates John William's Jaws theme. It is... not a good scene.
The box contains a Dybbuk, a malicious ghost from Jewish mythology, and it starts warping little Em in increasingly nasty ways, as well as killing or maiming minor characters in ridiculous-looking displays of telekinetic power. As the possession advances it drives a wedge between Clyde and his ex until he figures out what the threat is via the magic of google, and enlists the help of a Hassidic exorcist. The film ends as it began: with very few surprises.
Juliet Snowden and Stiles White's script starts out mostly well-constructed and it seems like it might be on to something interesting for a while - but as the film plods on that promise quickly dies away.
As likeable as Morgan is as the deadbeat-ish dad who needs to rise to the occasion (his vibe reminded a little of Craig T. Nelson in Poltergeist), the family drama is beyond clichéd (he misses his daughter's dance recital!)
Calis also does a phenomenal job as the spooky little possessed kid, but the horror side of things is about as bad as the drama; Both strands end up dovetailing into a disappointing finale that crams in as many hacky Hollywood beats as it possibly can from the two genres.
The script also starts losing it; At one point, Em stabs dad in the hand with a fork, a scene that's played for effect and then completely forgotten. Later, an inconvenient character gets chased away by the Dybbuk inna box with an unintentionally hilarious bit of poetic justice, and he's, again, never mentioned again.
The story is (very loosely, of course) based on a 'true story' that has long been proven a hoax. It became semi-famous off the back of an article by Leslie Gornstein about a sales listing for a haunted Jewish wine cabinet box. Gee, I wonder what someone's motivation would be to lie in that situation.
The script built around that premise doesn't really find any fresh angle at all; The fact that it's a dybbuk does not make the supernatural menace any different from any other haunted house/possession movie, and the exorcism faithfully follows the template set down by... well, The Exorcism, except it's done in traditional Jewish garb.
At least Bornedal and his old friend and ace cinematographer Dan Lausten develop a good atmosphere - the colours are so subdued the film sometimes looks monochrome. The problem is that, with one honourable exception, when it comes time to bring tension to a head the supposedly horrific moments are pretty dire.
I watched the heavily cut theatrical version - there's a longer cut out there, but reading up on it I doubt it would fix the film's issues; For example, when an old lady is thrown around in her house, do I really need to see her face banging against a glass in slow motion, shown from the other side? Well... yes, obviously - but it would clash just as badly as the rest of the 'scary' bits do against the dour, dead-serious tone of the movie.
At least the extensive cuts speak to another huge problem I had with the film, which is that the editing often seemed to cut scenes in odd places, giving the whole movie an oddly unprofessional feel. We can blame that, at least, on studio interference; Everything else, not so much: there's definitely room for movies where a possessing spirit appears in a CAT scan, but you can't expect me to take it seriously as this film seems to do. These are some catastrophic levels of tonal miscalculation here.